Integrated rate laws: concentration versus time

Learn the integrated rate laws for zeroth, first, and second order reactions, how to use them to predict concentrations, and how straight-line plots reveal order.

Quick answer

An integrated rate law gives reactant concentration as a function of time. For first order: [A]t = [A]₀e^(−kt); for second order: 1/[A]t = kt + 1/[A]₀; for zeroth order: [A]t = −kt + [A]₀.

[A]t=[A]0e−kt[A]_t = [A]_0e^{-kt}

Example: A first-order reaction with k = 0.0500 s⁻¹ starting at [A]₀ = 0.500 M has [A] = 0.500 × e^(−1.50) = 0.112 M after 30.0 s.

What you will learn

  • Write the integrated rate laws for zeroth, first, and second order reactions.
  • Calculate a concentration at a given time, or the time needed to reach a target concentration.
  • Identify reaction order from straight-line plots of concentration data.
  • Explain why each order has a different linear plot.

From rate laws to concentration versus time

The rate law rate = k[A]^m tells you the speed right now. But chemists often need the concentration later — how much reactant remains after an hour, or how long until 90% is gone. Integrating the differential rate law over time answers exactly that.

Each order integrates to a different relationship:

  • Zeroth order: [A]t=−kt+[A]0[A]_t = -kt + [A]_0
  • First order: [A]t=[A]0e−kt[A]_t = [A]_0e^{-kt}, or equivalently ln⁡[A]t=−kt+ln⁡[A]0\ln[A]_t = -kt + \ln[A]_0
  • Second order: 1[A]t=kt+1[A]0\dfrac{1}{[A]_t} = kt + \dfrac{1}{[A]_0}

All three assume constant temperature (so k does not change) and a single reactant dominating the rate expression.

Using the first-order law

The first-order form is the workhorse of kinetics. Because the fraction remaining after time t is e−kte^{-kt}, the math is clean. Example: a first-order decomposition has k = 0.0500 s⁻¹ and starts at [A]₀ = 0.500 M. After 30.0 s:

[A]30=0.500×e−(0.0500)(30.0)=0.500×e−1.50=0.500×0.223=0.112 M[A]_{30} = 0.500 \times e^{-(0.0500)(30.0)} = 0.500 \times e^{-1.50} = 0.500 \times 0.223 = 0.112\ \text{M}

Notice that after one "time constant" (t = 1/k = 20 s), about 37% (e−1e^{-1}) remains — a useful mental benchmark. The same equation governs radioactive decay, which is why half-life and first-order kinetics are inseparable.

Second and zeroth order in practice

Second-order reactions fall off faster at first, then linger: 1/[A] grows linearly with time. Example: for 2A → products with k = 0.80 M⁻¹s⁻¹ and [A]₀ = 0.40 M, the time to reach [A] = 0.10 M is

t=1/k⇒t=10.10−10.400.80=10−2.50.80=9.4 st = \frac{1/k}{ } \Rightarrow t = \frac{\frac{1}{0.10} - \frac{1}{0.40}}{0.80} = \frac{10 - 2.5}{0.80} = 9.4\ \text{s}

Zeroth order is the simplest: concentration drops at a constant rate, like a taxi meter, until the reactant runs out (the law stops applying at [A] = 0 — negative concentrations are unphysical).

Straight-line tests for order

Because each integrated law rearranges into y = mx + b form, the right plot is a straight line — and the wrong ones curve:

  • Zeroth order: [A] vs t is linear, slope = −k
  • First order: ln[A] vs t is linear, slope = −k
  • Second order: 1/[A] vs t is linear, slope = +k

In the lab, you plot all three and see which is straightest. The slope hands you k directly, and the linearity confirms the order — two results from one graph.

Variables and units

SymbolNameUnitMeaning
[A]t[A]tConcentration at time tMConcentration of reactant A at time t
[A]0[A]₀Initial concentrationMConcentration of reactant A at time zero
kkRate constantdepends on orderRate constant (constant temperature assumed)
ttTimesElapsed time

Common mistakes

✗ The integrated rate law and the differential rate law are two different theories.

They are the same law in different mathematical clothes. The differential form (rate = k[A]^m) describes the slope; integrating it gives concentration as a function of time. Same physics, different use.

✗ First-order plots of [A] versus time are straight lines.

For first order, [A] versus t curves downward exponentially — it is ln[A] versus t that is straight. Each order has its own linear plot, and mixing them up is a classic graphing error.

✗ The integrated laws work even when the temperature changes mid-reaction.

All integrated rate laws assume k is constant, which means constant temperature. If the temperature drifts, k drifts with it and the simple forms no longer apply.

Real-world applications

  • Pharmacokinetics: first-order integrated laws model how drug concentration falls between doses.

  • Environmental cleanup: predicting how long a pollutant persists in groundwater.

  • Materials aging: modeling the fading of dyes and the degradation of polymers.

  • Nuclear chemistry: every radioactive decay calculation is a first-order integrated rate law.

Frequently asked questions

How do I convert between the exponential and logarithmic forms?

Take the natural log of both sides: ln[A]t = −kt + ln[A]₀. The exponential form is best for calculating a concentration at a given time; the log form is best for graphing, because it is a straight line with slope −k.

What is the connection to half-life?

The half-life formula t½ = 0.693/k is just the integrated first-order law evaluated at [A]t = ½[A]₀. So half-life problems are integrated-rate-law problems in disguise — use whichever form is convenient.

Can I find k by graphing my data?

Yes, with caution. Fitting a straight line to ln[A] versus t data gives k from the slope, and the quality of the fit tells you whether first order is really the right model. Always check the other plots too — forcing the wrong order gives a misleading k.

Does every reaction follow one of these three laws?

Not always. Some reactions change order as conditions change, and some follow complex rate laws with no simple integrated form. The three standard integrated laws cover the most common textbook and laboratory cases, which is why they are worth mastering first.